Author: Mandy Li

The Weary Blues

Loading Likes...

Langston Hughe’s work was key to the Harlem Renaissance, a cultural and intellectual revival of black music, art, politics, and scholarship. This poem is set in Lenox Avenue in New York City, capturing the music of a Black blues musician and its profound impact on the speaker. For the speaker, blues music conveys not only the power and beauty of black art, but also the enduring struggles and injustices faced by the black community. In this way, while the poem provides almost no information on the speaker, I think it’s safe to assume the speaker is Black based on how the blues music resonance with them so much. The tone of the poem is full of pain, evident in the lines, “He made that poor piano moan with melody,” “played that sad raggy tune like a musical fool,” “Ain’t got nobody but ma self.” This expresses the historical injustice embedded in the blues music. Yet, the poem also infused with a kind of relief and freedom through the blues music as the speaker cries “O Blues!” “Sweet Blues!” suggesting that this painful music elicits both anguish but is also a powerful way to resist and endure racism. 

This poem struck me with how it seamlessly incorporates black music intro its poetic form and and message on racism and art. Hughes not only describes the blues music, but also infuses it into his poetic form. Black Americans brought blues music from South Africa to urban centers in America. During the Harlem Renaissance, leaders invented new artistic and literary forms, much like how this poem doesn’t follow a traditional form as a way to express the black experience in America. While it doesn’t have an established meter or a predictable rhyme scheme, it is still able to recreate the rhythms and sounds of blues music. “Thump, thump, thump, went his food on the floor. / He played a few chords then he sand some more” uses onomatopoeia and a strong rhythm, reminiscent the blues. Most of the poem is written in rhyming couplets but lines 19-22 uses ballad stanza and lines 25-30 rhyme ABABCB, which are forms and rhyme schemes that blues singers often use in their music. This deliberate incorporation and subsequent deconstruction of blues forms within the poem mirror the intricate, improvisational essence of blues music. 

One Art

Loading Likes...

I found Elizabeth Bishops villanelle “One Art”, enjoyable to read because of the way she masterfully uses the form explore themes of loss and grief. Bishop treats losing as a practice that you learn to master over time with many experiences. I was curious what she means by “mastering” the art of losing. Perhaps it means to accept the loss and move on with life with, accepting that it wasn’t a disaster, but a natural and inevitable part of life. But would more experiences with such heavy emotions necessarily help you?  The speaker declares that losing things isn’t hard to master and encourages the audience to try out losing something everyday. She speaks from her own experience, starting out by suggesting to love tangible and simple things like keys and time. However, in the next stanza, she tells us to lose “farther” and “faster”, such as places and names. In this sense, I felt that losing implies forgetting the memories of the places and names since you can’t physically lose them. She once again reiterates that losing and forgetting will not bring disaster, but might even a peace of mind. The speaker then says she lost even larger things that holds more meaning such as the mother’s watch and loved houses, instilling emotions and nostalgia into the loss. Even larger, rivers and continents, and finally, losing “you,” which I interpreted to be the speaker’s beloved. The progression of increasing loss made me feel like the speaker was direly holding on to her own philosophy that losing isn’t hard to master. The repetition of the last lines the art of losing isn’t hard to master served as a reminder to not just audience, but more so herself. The last stanza felt like an interruption of the poem’s form and message with the dashes and parentheses. While the first five stanzas suggest that the speaker has already mastered the art of loss and is teaching her audience, the last stanza reveals that it is still an ongoing process for the her as she copes with the loss of her beloved or the possibility of it. Her repetition was not a lie, but something she wants to believe that she can overcome and master this art. 

Of Mere Being

Loading Likes...

In this poem, Stevens paints a majestic image of a gold-feathered bird that sings and shines as the end is approaching. I interpreted this bird to be a phoenix because it symbolizes life, death, immortality, and resurrection. I believe Stevens is trying to make a point about existence and simply “being”, a realization the speaker has in a fleeting moment before the end when the speaker sees the bird. After having the “last thought,” the speaker sees an image of the phoenix. It is interesting when he says at the “palm at the end of the mind” because I first interpreted palm to be the palm of one’s hands which is very tangible and immediate, or it could be a palm tree which relates to nature and creates a sense of more distance. As I read on, I thought the speaker was talking about a palm tree because the bird is singing on the palm. It sings “without human feeling, a foreign song” which contrasts with the human viewer and the inhuman bird. In this way, the bird represents its own existence and “mere being” on the palm tree. Seeing the bird singing and existing makes the speaker realize that the reason we are happy or unhappy is not what we think it is. It may simply be because these feelings exist and are there because we are human. Stevens concludes with a final stanza that creates an even greater distance with the bird. In the last stanza, the bird is on the palm tree which is at the edge of space, a very vague and abstract area. In the very first line, the palm tree is said to be at the end of the mind, which is also very abstract. Perhaps it is the viewer that is in a strange place in time and space, and sees this image during the speaker’s “last thought”. The setting in which this poem takes place is fascinating to think about because where is the end of the mind and edge of space? Our thoughts are endless and space is infinite. Rather than flying through the sky, the bird stands on the palm and “The bird’s fire-fangled feather’s dangle down.” The abstract setting and the image of the bird makes me think that the speaker may be approaching death, and the vision of the phoenix induces the speaker to reflect on what life means, what it means to be. And perhaps the mere act of being is okay. 

Provide, Provide

Loading Likes...

Despite our efforts to accumulate wealth and power, make genuine friendships, and generally live the grand life we want, Frost confronts the inevitability of death and questions the fundamental questions about the way we live our lives through allusions and irony. He begins the poem talking about a woman he describes as a witch, who was one the beauty Abishad, which is a reference to a beautiful maiden brought to warm King David. Despite once being a Hollywood star, being at the top of the world, she now washes steps with a pail and rag. This demonstrates the downfall of those that are great, how unexpected and inevitable it is. After talking about one example of how one has fallen from grace, the speaker turns the situation to the reader saying how “you” might doubt the likelihood of this happening and “you” should make up “your” mind. I wondered who Frost’s audience may be when writing this. He seems critical about the way humans may want to live materialistically, because it will all be lost in the end. He ironically says if you are predestined to die anyway, why not die earlier to avoid the pain and suffering? In the next line, he then suggests that we can’t choose if we die, but we can decide the “state” in which we die, which implies that we still have some power in how we choose to life our life, and the meaning of it all. He further uses irony to make his point in the last stanza when he says it’s better to go down with purchased friendships, rather than genuine ones or none at all, to avoid getting hurt. Frost uses caesura in only one instance, the last line: “Than none at all. Provide, provide!” which creates an even greater emphasis on the title and his overall message. The inevitability of death is all the more reason we must provide ourselves with a life that is meaningful even in the face of death, and that choice is ours to make. 

The River-Merchant’s Wide: a Letter

Loading Likes...

This poem is Ezra Pound’s reinterpretation of Chinese writer Li Bai’s work. (known as Li Po by Pound). It is a letter from a young wife written to her merchant husband that has been away for five months. She recounts memories of her relationship and love for him evolving. They grew up in the same village of Chokan. At this point, they had no feelings for each other, “Two small people, without dislike or suspicion.” One she married him at the tender age of 14, she still didn’t love him. Instead she was shy and couldn’t even look or respond to him. Perhaps, they were married due to societal pressures and she was expected to act a certain way. But after a year of marriage, she fell deeply in love with him, to the point where she said: “I desired my dust to be mingled with yours / forever and forever and forever.” I found this line to be a bit disturbing because after just one year, she wishes that they will die and be together forever. It is clear that her feelings are intense, but at the same time, this thought shows that she is still young and naive. The intensity of her love that evolved so rapidly shows the unexpected and transformative power of love. It is a feeling that comes with time and changes in ways you don’t expect. After another year, the husband has left for a journey and it has been five long months so she writes a letter. It is not clear when he will return if ever, but she asks him to let her know when he will return so she will wait for him. It is also not clear how or if he will ever receive this letter in the first place. The separation of the two adds another complexity to their relationship and love. The husband’s absence makes the speaker miss him and love him even more. And the uncertainty of his return strengthens her love and longing for him. She is both sorrowful and hopeful as the seasons change, time passes, and she grows older. It is ironic she mentions that she is growing older since she is still only 16 years old during this time, but perhaps it is the speaker acknowledging the passage of time and her own mortality in the face of love, devotion, and anticipation. 

The Soul selects her own Society

Loading Likes...

I read this poem as Dickinson’s rationale for her unique lifestyle and beliefs on forming friendships and relationships. She was remembered as extremely reserved with only a few close friends, so in a way, she is the “soul” that selects “her own society.” Once the soul chooses her people, she unapologetically “shuts the Door”, so that not even those that are divine can enter. This suggests that the speaker’s resolve to live in relative solitude, in a small society, is unwavering even in the face of divine beings or important people, like the Emperor that is kneeling by the gate. The soul lives by her own rules rather than following the “divine Majority” that might value prestige and power. Instead, the soul values her own independence and freedom to choose whom she wants to associate with. The constant use of caesura in the form of dashes in and at the end of each line creates a physical separation between the inner society the speaker creates, and the outer world. 

At first, I thought the soul and the speaker to be one, but I noticed that the speaker describing the soul in third person rather than just writing the poem in first person creates a certain distinction. This creates a deeper reasoning for why the speaker, or Dickinson, lives this way. It is her soul from within that makes these decisions, rather than the speaker herself. She cannot control it; it is only natural that her soul does this. Yet, in a way, this contradicts my previous point that living in relative solitude is a choice. It is the choice of the soul, and that dictates the way the speaker lives. 

The last line compares the soul to a stone, unchanging and unwavering. The stone is self-reliant and doesn’t let anyone in. At the same time, it also lacks emotion and humanness. I was curious if Dickinson meant to write this part in a positive or negative light, since it can be read in different ways. Might the choice to choose your own small society and shut the rest of the world have some downsides? Or is it a simply a strong conviction of independence and way to protect oneself?

The Windhover By Hopkins

Loading Likes...

Hopkins begins the sonnet with a plethora of poetic patterning such as alliteration and assonance. This is evident in the first two lines when the speaker says “morning morning’s minion” and “kingdom of daylight’s dauphin, dapple-dawn-drawn Falcon” with rich repetition of m and d letters. It is only after these vivid descriptions that the speaker introduces the central subject of the poem: the Falcon, specifically a Windhover. This technique shows the profound impact the bird has on the speaker, when they “caught” a rare sight of the bird in the morning. At the same time, it builds suspense for the reader in finding out what is so mesmerizing that the speaker is looking at. Hopkins continues to masterfully use poetic language in the first octet to bring the sight to life. The fast-paced, continuous rhymes, enjambment serves to capture the breathtaking beauty of the Windhover.

The sestet shifts to place the beauty and bravery of the bird into a broader context, as the poem is dedicated To Christ Our Lord. The sestet is written in present tense, unlike than the past tense of the octet which is a memory the speaker had of the bird. Rather than sensory details, the speaker speaks in a more spiritual and mysterious way, which was a bit more difficult for me to interpret. The metaphorical portrayal of “fire” is “a billion / Times told lovelier, more dangerous” and “gash gold-vermillion” creates a more divine image of existence, elevating the bird beyond its aerial presence. The Windhover is just one of God’s many creations of nature, and the speaker’s awe of its beauty in the sky is a testament their appreciation of God’s power. 

“A Slumber Did My Spirit Seal” William Wordsworth

Loading Likes...

“A Slumber Did My Spirit Seal” deals with the speaker reflecting and coping with the death of his beloved. The poem offers a thought-provoking take on using the concept of slumber to symbolize the illusion of perpetual youth and protection against human mortality. I initially viewed death as an eternal slumber, but Wordsworth’s perspective suggests otherwise: he portrays life alongside his beloved as a dream-like state of slumber and is only able to wake up to confront the grief and stark truth of human mortality after the death of his beloved. In this way, he suggests that confronting death is the only way to break out of the slumber that seals our spirits from enlightenment. 

The first stanza describes the speaker with his spirit sealed in slumber, meaning his mind is protected from the idea of mortality. Here, “I had no human fears” (line 2), though seemingly resolute, actually underscores his resistance to acknowledging the harsh realities of existence. He idealizes his beloved as immortal, unaffected by the passage of earthly time. This illusion of immortality, initially used to protect the speaker, only ends up hurting him more once she passes away because it makes it harder to accept the truth. In the second stanza, he states the obvious, “No motion… no force; / She neither hears no sees” (lines 5-6). Having awoken from his prolonged slumber, he realizes his beloved, like all humans, was affected by “earth’s dinural course” (line 7). To cope with this, he redirects her existence into rocks, stones, and trees, implying that she has become part of the earth and lives on.