Author: Leah Reed

“Jabberwocky”

Loading Likes...

“Jabberwocky” is a poem famous for its utter nonsense. Like much of the setting in “Alice Through the Looking Glass” follows dream logic, this poem seems to follow nonsense logic. It feels like every other word is completely made-up, yet taken as a whole the poem makes perfect sense. Carroll wrote this poem in a childrens’ book, so he had to know that to keep a young mind engaged he would have to do something to make the poem stand out. His nonsense words feel like words that a young brain would create, and are typically alliterized onomatopoeias. There is little deeper meaning I could find in the poem – I think it is very much what it says on the tin. But nonetheless, this poem has infected our culture and uses language in a way that almost makes me think of a childish Shakespeare.

“The Bean Eaters”

Loading Likes...

“The Bean Eaters” is a very striking poem in its mundanity. The focus of the poem is an old couple that seem just like any other – their skin has yellowed in their old age, they don’t eat any fancy meals – they are simply remaining and waiting for their time. Based on the fact that this poem is from 1960, the old couple likely lived through the hardships of the Great Depression and WWII, and you get this sense from just how simple their lifestyle is. They’ve seen the horrors of the world and lived through times where people had nothing, and now they live together with their cheap silverware and hoarded receipts. From the lines “Two who have lived their day, / But keep putting on their clothes / And putting things away” the reader gets a sense that they are just hanging on. They don’t have any real purpose left but living. But they still remember how it used to be.

“Mending Wall”

Loading Likes... “Mending Wall” is a poem that is framed in an almost playful tone, but asks something rather deep of the reader – to consider why they build walls. Every year the narrator and his neighbors fix the wall between them, and every year it breaks again when winter comes. The two of them have no livestock, the their plants are ones that will not harm each other, so why do they build this wall? Is it simply tradition? The neighbor seems to think so, at least to a point – all he does is repeat the saying he learned from his father: “Good fences make good neighbors.” It seems the narrators main reason for building the wall is to keep hunters off of his land. His question to the neighbor is not posed as a serious one, but as him trying to be cheeky.

I think this poem gets at the strange nature of humans. We are naturally social animals, yet we often fear showing emotion to others and letting ourselves be open. We wall ourselves in to protect ourselves from getting hurt, and because it is what is expected of us. People are expected to keep their problems and emotions to themselves in most situations. But the more we wall ourselves in, the more likely we are to become unstable until the wall bursts, and we are sent back to rebuild it.

“They shut my up in Prose”

Loading Likes...

Emily Dickinson is a fascinating poet whose poetry tends to be a bit abstract, and this poem is no exception. What does she mean by “They shut me up in Prose?” – is it that society expects her to not write poetry? Someone else? And why? To me, the rest of the poem is fairly simple to grasp – she was locked away as a child because she was too rowdy or talkative, but like a bird can simply fly away, her thoughts could not be tamed.

Perhaps the same people who liked her “still” wanted her in a more traditional writing medium than poetry. Maybe poetry simply wasn’t for respectable American women. Dickinson was correct though when she compared herself to the bird. Whoever tried to lock her to prose failed, and though in her lifetime she stayed locked away, post-mortum she became one of the most famous American poets.

“Beat! Beat! Drums!”

Loading Likes...

“Beat! Beat! Drums!” is a very classic Whitman poem – it has long lines with rhythm despite its lack of consistent meter, alliteration, no rhyme, use of questions and exclamations, and themes of war and average Americans. In this poem, Whitman also uses repetition to great affect. Each stanza starts and ends with the sounds of the drums and bugles of war, while the middle talks about the average Americans and how they are effected. Just like war surrounds daily life, war surrounds the stanzas.

One thing I found interesting is that it is hard to tell if the poem is pro- or anti-war. On the one hand, it is talking about how it has disrupted daily life, but it also it commands the effort to continue. The narrator says that there should be “no parley” and that the suffering people should be ignored – is this genuine? I could honestly see arguments in either direction. Historically, Whitman was a known supporter of President Lincoln and worked to help the Northern War effort, but he also loved America and feared that the war would forever fracture his country. The poem seems to reflect his own complicated feelings about the war, though of course it is hard to say what a poem says about its author. It is also interesting to me that the poem focuses on the sounds of drums and bugles, the patriotic and triumphant sounds of war, not the gunshots and screams. Whitman worked in hospitals in the DC area and was well aware of the damage war did to its soldiers, but still put an emphasis on the “noble” sounds of war. This could mean the poem is coming on the side of the war as a necessary evil.

“Ozymandias”

Loading Likes...

In Shelley’s “Ozymandias” the form of the poem directly links to the meaning. It is clearly a sonnet with its 14 lines and iambic pentameter, but the rhyme scheme is broken in multiple places, and there are many lines that starts with trochees or have them embedded within them. Lines 2, 4, and 9 have no rhyming lines, and lines 3, 6, and 11 start with trochees. I find this very interesting because “Ozymandias” is about the statue of a once-mighty king who has been forgotten by time. There is a large statue that was clearly once grand, but all that remains are the legs and face in the sand, and the legacy of its sculptor. The sonnet form is a very old one that can be very restrictive, like an ancient tyrant. But the form isn’t what matters – those who use it are what is remembered. In the poem, the traveler praises the sculptor for his brilliant work on the statue, even though it is broken and lying in the sand. Even though Shelley has broken the traditional form, his work can still be beautiful, and will be remembered beyond its context.

“The Tyger”

Loading Likes...

“The Tyger” by William Blake has been one of my favorite poems from the first time I read it at around 7-years-old. Though I didn’t know the words for it at the time, the trochaic meter and rhyming couplets made the 24 line poem feel very fast and snappy. What I love about the poem to this day is how it is very intuitive to understand, but still leaves many layers to be unraveled. As a young girl I was able to understand that it was about a person asking how the same God who made all the wonderful and gentle things in the world had it in him to create a creature as vicious as a tiger. But looking at it now, with greater age and knowledge of its companion poem, “The Lamb,” it is clear the poem holds more complexities. While “The Lamb” is written from the perspective of a young child who is too innocent to realize that a lamb will be slaughtered, “The Tyger” is written by a child old enough to question the will of God.

 

Another part of the poem I quite like is that at the end of the first and last stanzas, the narrator asks “What immortal hand or eye / Could frame thy fearful symmetry,” which brings symmetry to the poem as a whole, which is immortal. It brings up an idea that poets are immortal, and perhaps frames God himself as a poet of the world.

“On Being Brought From Africa to America”

Loading Likes...

One thing that is essential to understanding Phillis Wheatley’s poetry is that she was a black woman who grew up in America during the time of slavery. She was well aware of the injustices served both to women, and even more so, people of color. Yet she was also aware that her audience, and her publishers, were mostly white men. If she wanted her voice to be heard, she had to be very careful in her criticism of slavery. In this particular poem, there is clearly very careful word choice around her audience. She calls Africa a “pagan land,” and thanks the people who brought her over and taught her the ways of God. This would play into the idea of the “white man’s burden” that many believed in at the time, and make readers more willing to listen to her. She then goes on to suggest that if she was black and found redemption, others like her could as well. She makes a biblical allusion to Cain, showing that she was in fact knowledgeable about the bible in general and of the supposed “justification” for slavery. Wheatley was always fighting a battle to show that women and people of color could be just as clever as any white man, and to make an argument for the moral implications of slavery. If people of color could write poetry, the “highest form” of writing, how could they be mere beasts fit for enslavement? In her writing, she is able to in eight poignant lines make that very argument.

“When I Consider How My Light Is Spent”

Loading Likes...

In John Milton’s poem, “When I Consider How My Light Is Spent,” we see Milton use the Petrarchan Sonnet form to talk about something other than strictly love. In 1652, Milton completely lost vision in both eyes, a devastating ailment to have, especially as an author. In this sonnet the narrator is clearly meant to be Milton himself as he considers how he’s spent the time he’s had with vision, and wonders what he will do with it gone. This sonnet, like much of his work, has a highly religious undertone, with him asking God if he still must work while blind and receiving answers from a spirit of Patience, which tells him God requires no mans labor, blind or no. What I found particularly interesting about this poem is that Milton was famously in favor of religious freedom, and spent much of his time fighting for these principals. Though he himself was Catholic and had a deep interest in the Bible, he believed that State-Sanctioned religion was against the will of God. In this poem when he asks if he is still expected to do the Lord’s work once blind, he likely isn’t strictly referencing his work on poetry like “Paradise Lost,” but instead more broadly referencing the political work he did with Oliver Cromwell. It seems to me the answer he is given is that if he is patient, the work will happen on its own. In the last three lines Patience tells Milton that “Thousands at his bidding speed / And post o’er land and ocean without rest: / They also serve who only stand and wait.” (lines 12-14), meaning that God as many followers that tirelessly spread his word to all, not just those who are constantly in action. In this poem, Milton gives himself permission to rest.