Author: Fiona Breen

The Bean Eaters

Loading Likes... For my final blog post I chose to write about “The Bean Eaters”. From this poem I took away a message about nostalgia and human’s tendency to yearn for the past. The poem paints a bleak picture of a couple in their elderly age. I found that the poem’s title really encapsulated the entirety of the poem. The title “The Bean Eaters” not only references such a mundane task that all humans do, but also mentions one of the most plain and simple foods that there is. This lack of detail and simplicity seems to be carried on throughout the poem in details like the plain dishware and walking through tasks like putting on clothes with barely any detail. I found that the surface level explanation and detail in the poem painted a picture of a very nondescript couple, one where you could think of this couple as anyone. I think that that’s the point of this poem, that anyone can relate to the sullen feeling of everyday life and the yearning for the past that the final stanza describes.

As I mentioned earlier the first two stanzas paint the picture of a rather versatile couple, almost faceless. It is in the final stanza of the poem that I feel it reaches its meaning. In this stanza line three is particularly longer than other lines in the poem. This line lists elements and memories that remind the couple of the past. I found that the length of this line emphasized the degree to which the couple is remembering. I think this is meant to be a commentary on human’s tendency to lean towards nostalgia and miss out on the beauty of the present. Hence why when the poem describes the present it is rather bleak and sullen.

Incident

Loading Likes...

For this week’s blog post I chose to write about the poem “Incident” by Countee Cullen. I found that this poem carried themes of racism and messages regarding its negative and lasting impact. However, considering that this was my take away from the poem I found the structure of the poem and way one reads it to be very interesting. In the poem there is no mention of racism or even a suggestion that the significance of the interaction is related to race until line 8 when the child is called a racial slur. In addition, the poem begins in a very light hearted tone mentioning the child’s “glee” and “smile”. I also found it significant that when the child first sees the Baltimorean he only acknowledges his size and age (nothing about race). I found that these details in the beginning of the poem effectively capture the child’s innocence and reveal that at the start of the poem the child does not live everyday in a world where racism is present. However, this dramatically shifts when the child is called a racist slur in line 8.


In the final stanza of the poem the child mentions how during his 7 month visit he saw the “whole of Baltimore”. Both the length of this stay and the size of the city emphasize how big and eventful this experience must have been. However this feeling of largeness and weight is juxtaposed with the smallness of the moment when the child reveals that being called the slur was “all I remember”. Well to some it may seem that this moment was such a small detail as the juxtaposition insinuates, the comparison to the large city actually reveals how big this moment was for the child. I found there to be a dramatic shift in the final 5 lines of the poem. As I mentioned earlier the poem begins with a tone of innocence and joy but after the mention of the slur shifts to depressing and painful. I found this shift to be revealing of the gravity of this situation for the child. Well initially the child did not live everyday experiencing racism, this small moment has opened his eyes to the sad reality of racism’s presence. I found that this dramatic shift for a child so young is revealing of the heavy and long lasting impact of racism and how much it can alter one’s everyday life.

The Fish

Loading Likes... I chose to write this week’s blog post on the poem “The Fish” by Mariane Moore. What originally stood out to me about the poem was the detailed imagery that captures the beauty of the sea so well. However, as I continued to re-read the poem I found that the poem possessed a much deeper meaning than simply describing the ocean’s beauty. I interpreted this poem to carry deep themes of humanity v.s. nature. Moore’s imagery paints a peaceful picture of the sea making it seem as though the sea creatures, plants, and other parts of the sea all live in harmony. One part of the poem that particularly stood out to me was lines 8-13 which says, “The barnacles which encrust the side//of the wave, cannot hide//there for the submerged shafts of the//sun,//split like spun//glass”. These barnacles are not actually part of the wave but this image of the rays of sun and barnacles coming together in one wave creates this feeling of peace and unity within the sea. It is as if all parts of the sea are tied together in some way co-existing.

However, this peacefulness of nature is not free from the touch of mankind. Later on in the poem it is revealed that humans have left a mark on the cliff when the poem says, “dynamite grooves, burns, and//hatchet strokes, these things stand//out on it”. The disruptiveness of the human touch on the natural rock face is revealing of the destructiveness of humanity. However, despite humanity disrupting nature, nature endures. The poem explains how the cliff lives on and “the sea grows old in it”. I found this line to be revealing of how Moore views nature. Despite the disruptiveness of humanity, the harmony of nature endures and outlives any harm done. In addition to this comparison between humanity and nature, Moore also compares the disruptive nature of humanity with disruptions within the ocean ecosystem. In lines 18-20 the poem reveals that the ocean itself has also disrupted the cliff saying, “The water drives a wedge//of iron through the iron edge//of the cliff”. However, despite the waves cracking the rockface open the poem reveals that this allows for a home for numerous sea creatures. Within the sea this cracking of the rock, that was so destructive from humanity, is a natural process that supports the life of the sea.

Overall, the poem “The Fish” carries messages of a comparison between nature and humanity as well as the destruction of mankind.

The Second Coming

Loading Likes...

For this week’s blog post I decided to focus on the poem “The Second Coming” by William Butler Yeats. To completely understand the meaning of this poem I had to do some background research on it. I found that the poem was written just after the end of World War 1. This helped me to contextualize and understand the first stanza of the poem. The first stanza paints a picture of chaos and anarchy where a falcon cannot hear its caller and people have lost their way. Based on the time that this poem was written I came to understand that this state of chaos was referencing the war that had just occurred. I especially found this symbolism of the falcon to be very important. I thought that the line, “falcon cannot hear the falconer” might be a commentary on humans losing their connection to earth and nature. The image of things falling apart and “innocence is drowned” makes me think that the poem is arguing that humanity has lost its way and war has created a failed rather than successful society.

The second stanza then dives into a religious discussion that is alluded to in the poem’s title: The second coming of Christ. In Christianity the second coming of Christ is essentially the day that Jesus returns to judge his enemies, reward the faithful, and set up his kingdom. I found it very interesting that the title of the poem alludes to this event and then paints a very different picture. In the second stanza the speaker lets out calls of a second coming. However, in contrast to the biblical telling, the speaker describes an image of a “shape with lion body and the head of a man” coming out of the desert. The poem then says, “that twenty centuries of stony sleep Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle”. I believe that these twenty centuries are referring to humanity’s time on earth and that its “stony sleep” was interrupted by this brutal war that disrupted all progress they had made. I think that the purpose of this beast appearing in the re-envisioned second coming is meant to argue that humans have failed and this beast is coming as a way to punish them for their shortcomings.

Ozymandias

Loading Likes...

For this week’s blog post I chose to focus on “Ozymandias”. Upon first reading this poem it really caught my eye because of how the structure feels more like a story than a poem due to the speaking of the traveler in quotation marks. After reading the poem a few times and doing some background research this unique structure started to make sense to me. Ozymandias, who the poem is about, was actually the Greek name of a pharaoh. To me this put into perspective what the message of the poem might be about. The storytelling structure made me feel as though the poem was about the legacy of this pharaoh and how long it lasts, just as stories are told over and over again.

I found that the poem reveals a not so favorable image of the Pharaoh. The traveler describes the statue of the pharaoh as “two vast and trunkless legs” as well as a “half sunk a shattered visage”. I found this descriptive imagery to reveal a theme of fleeting power. Normally statues are meant to be an ode to their subject. The fact that the poem describes the statue as crumbled and in shambles reveals the little respect and legacy that is left of the pharaoh. I believe that this imagery is employed to reveal that power inevitably crumbles. In addition, I think that the sand that the statue’s face is “sunk” into is also a symbol of how power is fleeting overtime. The description of sand in the poem brought to mind both the changing patterns of sand dunes overtime and the passage of time in a sand hourglass. I believe that the sand is meant to symbolize the loss of the Pharaohs’ power overtime.

Finally, I think the last four lines of the poem further reveal this theme of fleeting power. Ozymandias says, “Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!”. I interpreted this line to be an exclamation coming from Ozymandias to look at everything his mighty power had created. However, the traveler reveals that everything that surrounds the statue is “boundless and bare”. Essentially the pharaoh boasts of his legacy when truly nothing remains. This is revealing of the arrogance that comes with power.

She Walks in Beauty

Loading Likes...

I decided to write my second blog post on “She Walks in Beauty” by Lord Byron. I interpreted this poem as an ode to a particular woman’s beauty, perhaps the speaker’s love interest. I found that the poem describes the women’s beauty as rare and delicate. Byron employs a simile to compare the women to a night sky saying, “She walks in beauty, like the night//Of cloudless climes and starry skies”(1-2). A cloudless night sky where one can see the stars is both gorgeous and rare. I thought that this comparison revealed how the speaker views the woman’s beauty as just as perfect and rare as this intersection of cloudless and starry. I believe this view of the rarity of the woman’s beauty is also depicted when the speaker says, “One shade the more, one ray the less,//Had half impaired the nameless grace”(7-8). I interpreted this line to mean that any adjustment in any way would throw off the woman’s beauty. This woman’s appearance is just so rare and perfect that it balances the “shade” and “ray” perfectly before falling out of perfection.

Not only is the woman’s beauty perfect to the speaker, but I felt as though the speaker views the woman as heavenly. The speaker says, “Thus mellowed to that tender light //Which heaven to gaudy day denies”(5-6). The speaker is saying that this soft and delicate light/beauty is so rare that it is not seen often only in heaven. To the speaker the woman is so beautiful that she must come from heaven. There is something so serene and perfect about this woman that she is almost too rare for the earthly world. I think that this comparison and viewing of the women is meant to portray her as being above the speaker in the speaker’s eyes. The speaker views her in a way that is similar to religious worship. Overall I think this poem is also meant to show that the woman’s external beauty also makes her internally pure. The poem says, “A mind at peace with all below,// A heart whose love is innocent!” (17-18). I felt as though this last line tied the poem together, expressing that the woman’s external glow reflects the brightness and pureness within her.

When I consider how my light is spent

Loading Likes...

For this week’s blog post I’m choosing to focus on the poem When I consider how my light is spent by John Milton. With some background research I determined that Milton had gone blind before writing this poem which was key to my understanding of it and the central theme. I interpreted this poem to be Milton grappling with his loss of sight and how this affects his ability to serve god. Milton opens the poem considering how his “light is spent”. To me in this poem light is an example of conceit where the author compares his ability to see to light. Thus, when he thinks about how his “light is spent” and his time in “this dark world” Milton is pondering his loss of sight and transition into life as a blind man. One thing I noticed within this poem is that Milton’s diction helps to communicate the emotions he experiences with his loss of sight. I found the word “lodged” in line 4 to be particularly powerful as it creates this feeling of being stuck. Through his word choice Milton communicates to the reader how he feels stuck with this now useless skill of vision that is lodged within him and disruptive.

Milton continues on in the poem discussing how he wants to “serve” his “maker”, which I interpreted to be god, but wonders if he even can or is supposed to with his loss of sight. Something that I noticed that was unique in this poem was the capitalization of certain words in the middle of lines. For example Milton capitalizes the words “Soul”, “Maker”, and describes god as “Kingly”. I noticed that all of these words had a spiritual connection, so by capitalizing them Milton places emphasis on his connection to god and makes religion a central theme within the poem. Within the poem I particularly love the line “But patience, to prevent That murmur, soon replies, ‘God doth not need Either man’s work or his own gifts’”. I interpreted the “murmur” that is mentioned to be the lines of poetry before this line which are Milton’s train of thought. This line makes me think that this poem is Milton thinking out loud and vocalizing his internal conflict. In the end Milton comes to the conclusion that “man’s work” and “gifts” are not what god deems important, rather it is those who listen and serve him that he appreciates.

I found that this poem carries strong themes of faith, identity, and salvation which Milton communicates particularly well through his diction and use of conceit.