Month: November 2023

One Art

Loading Likes...

I found Elizabeth Bishops villanelle “One Art”, enjoyable to read because of the way she masterfully uses the form explore themes of loss and grief. Bishop treats losing as a practice that you learn to master over time with many experiences. I was curious what she means by “mastering” the art of losing. Perhaps it means to accept the loss and move on with life with, accepting that it wasn’t a disaster, but a natural and inevitable part of life. But would more experiences with such heavy emotions necessarily help you?  The speaker declares that losing things isn’t hard to master and encourages the audience to try out losing something everyday. She speaks from her own experience, starting out by suggesting to love tangible and simple things like keys and time. However, in the next stanza, she tells us to lose “farther” and “faster”, such as places and names. In this sense, I felt that losing implies forgetting the memories of the places and names since you can’t physically lose them. She once again reiterates that losing and forgetting will not bring disaster, but might even a peace of mind. The speaker then says she lost even larger things that holds more meaning such as the mother’s watch and loved houses, instilling emotions and nostalgia into the loss. Even larger, rivers and continents, and finally, losing “you,” which I interpreted to be the speaker’s beloved. The progression of increasing loss made me feel like the speaker was direly holding on to her own philosophy that losing isn’t hard to master. The repetition of the last lines the art of losing isn’t hard to master served as a reminder to not just audience, but more so herself. The last stanza felt like an interruption of the poem’s form and message with the dashes and parentheses. While the first five stanzas suggest that the speaker has already mastered the art of loss and is teaching her audience, the last stanza reveals that it is still an ongoing process for the her as she copes with the loss of her beloved or the possibility of it. Her repetition was not a lie, but something she wants to believe that she can overcome and master this art. 

Sestina

Loading Likes...

The form of the poem, “Sestina” by Elizabeth Bishop was incredibly interesting to me, and something I felt informed the poem’s meaning remarkably well; the recurring use of certain words in the poem draws attention to significant themes such as family, home, grief, and time, and the concluding words in this context are all directly linked to these themes. The poem’s structure creates a sense of repetition and circularity, reminiscent of the seasonal cycles mentioned in the opening stanza. The strict and predictable form also reflects the inevitability of external forces that impact the grandmother and child. I was also struck by how the intertwined words in the poem might symbolize the profound bond between the grandmother and her grandchild, as well as the transmission of trauma across generations. Each stanza inherits and reorganizes fragments from the preceding one, mirroring how children inherit traits, but more importantly, trauma, from their parents and grandparents. Even the poem’s title, in some roundabout way, alludes to this cyclical nature of inter-generational struggle through a reference to its repetitive form.

I’m also quite curious about Bishops outlook on her own poetry. After a quick google search, I found that she didn’t like to include herself in the genre of confessional poetry, even though I would consider her chosen subject matter and form to fall quite directly under that categorization, and I wondered what her reasoning behind this distinction might be.

Poetry

Loading Likes...

Marianne Moore’s “Poetry” is fascinating because it speaks to the definition of poetry, and what its purpose and value is. The poem describes how “When they become so derivative as to become unintelligible, . the same thing may be said for all of us, that we / do not admire what / we cannot understand” (ll. 8-11). This, in conjunction with the poem’s idea that poetry is “a place for the genuine” (l. 3), expresses that poetry written just for the sake of creating intelligent-sounding phrases. It reminds me of Pope’s An Essay on Criticism in its argument that poetry should have something meaningful to say. Here, I understand her to be arguing that poetry should have a language element that is intriguing and “raw,” but should also have a real meaning behind it, a concrete idea that is not a “high-sounding interpretation” (l. 7). 

The form of the poem plays into this somewhat. It is written in free verse, with no sort of meter or rhyme, and can be easily read as prose. She writes in complete sentences, with each sentence a self-contained idea, which brings about the question of what makes this work into poetry. From her argument in the poem, it seems that her answer is the ideas: that she is conveying a real idea in a format that cannot be accurately captured in another form of writing. 

“Poetry,” interestingly, was heavily revised over her lifetime. The footnote after the title says that the poem was eventually cut down to the first three lines, making the entire poem “I, too, dislike it: there are things that are important beyond all this fiddle. / Reading it, however, with a perfect contempt for it, one discovers  in / it after all, a place for the genuine.” The choice to eliminate all other lines reflects the attitude towards poetry that she expresses in the poem. She takes out everything but, it seems, the heart of her argument: that poetry may not seem something good on first look, but it has the ability to convey real meaning. She adapts her work to better fit her ideal image of poetry. 

The Inevitable Loss of Innocence

Loading Likes...

“Sestina” by Elizabeth Bishop was such a sad poem to read and kind of reminded me of “Spring and Fall” by Hopkins, as both poems touch upon the saddening loss of a child’s innocence. In the poem, readers are informed that the grandmother is hiding something sad from the child, possibly to protect the child’s innocence. She conceals her sadness by “reading the jokes from the almanac, / laughing and talking to hide her tears” (lines 5-6). Almanacs are typically collections of stored data generally about the weather, astronomy, etc., usually presented in the order of a calendar. I thought that it was odd for her to be telling jokes from a book that is intended to be informational. Therefore, I interpreted the almanac have a deeper meaning actually representing a collection of the grandmother’s stored memories throughout her lifetime, good and bad. By her reading jokes from the book, it seems as though she is reminiscing about her past telling only the good memories to the child and avoiding the tragic event that is making her sad. The repetition of “tears” and the “rain” seem to represent the emotion of sadness and the house is also a source of protection to keep the child away from the rain, or the sadness. 

In the second stanza it is interesting how the grandmother feels that the period of sadness is determined by the almanac, but she knows this only because she has lived for a while and no longer has the innocence of a child. This idea is similar to the cyclic cycle of nature where winter comes every year often representing death, loss, or darkness in “Spring and Fall.” 

The personification of the “teakettle sing[ing]” and the rain and tears dancing shows that the darkness cannot stay hidden from the child forever. Their singing and dancing grabs the child’s attention and the child can’t help but watch (lines 13-16). As the child watches the “tears” fall down the kettle and hears the beat of the rain on the roof, the darkness is revealed to the child, even if the child doesn’t fully understand what it means. This idea is also seen when the grandmother hangs the almanac, which I interpreted her to do to keep out of the child’s reach. However, “…the almanac hover[ed] half open above the child, / hover[ed] above the old grandmother / and her teacup full of dark brown tears” (lines 20-22). The truth will come out as time goes on and the child’s innocence cannot be protected forever. As the book hovered open over the child, the content of the almanac was exposed to the child in which we can see the child express through the drawings. “She shivers and says she thinks the house / feels chilly, and puts more wood in the stove,” shows that the grandmother didn’t even notice that the book was hanging open which also portrays how the grandmother can’t protect the child forever. The child will find out even if the grandmother does’t actually tell the child herself. The hovering book seems to also create this darkness, or even quite literally a shadow, making everything underneath it darker. Being in the shadow seems to also make the room colder just as being exposed to darkness creates a chilling feeling. 

As the child tries to show the grandmother his drawings, the grandmother ignores the child by “bus[ing] herself about the stove” (32).  The grandmother is clearly ignoring whatever the issue is thinking that it will just go away, but this is not true as the “child draws another inscrutable house” (39). Although the issue is not quite clear to the child as represented by his drawings, he has been exposed and will only continue to learn more losing his innocence. 

The Red Wheelbarrow

Loading Likes...

This poem is a mystery. At a first glance, it’s vague and shallow. It paints a singular picture in a singular sentence: a rained-on red wheelbarrow sitting next to some white chickens. But the opening line, “so much depends / upon” is the true brain boggler. What exactly depends upon this image that Williams is illustrating? And what exactly does the red wheelbarrow next to chickens mean? What part do we focus on? The color red? The rain water? Or the whiteness of the chickens? Does the ominous subject of the poem depend upon this image under the condition that each of these factors exists, or would it change if the wheelbarrow was blue or if it was sunny outside or it was beside some cows?

From my interpretation, I can’t decide whether this poem is about the societal dependency of every-day, previously unnoticed objects, or if it’s a broader appreciation of agriculture and its impact on human civilization. The former would mean that the wheelbarrow is merely an example of an object that people take for granted and the key emphasis of the poem is on the simplicity. On the other hand, the latter would indicate that the image itself is the important part because of the references to agriculture and farming as a whole. The poem could be an appreciation of the fact that humanity was and is only able to progress because of the invention and innovation of farming. So, the “so much depends / upon” is really just so much– progress, technology, love, creativity, leisure, safety. All of these things depend on the reliability of the rainy red wheelbarrow sitting by some chickens. 

Of Mere Being

Loading Likes...

In this poem, Stevens paints a majestic image of a gold-feathered bird that sings and shines as the end is approaching. I interpreted this bird to be a phoenix because it symbolizes life, death, immortality, and resurrection. I believe Stevens is trying to make a point about existence and simply “being”, a realization the speaker has in a fleeting moment before the end when the speaker sees the bird. After having the “last thought,” the speaker sees an image of the phoenix. It is interesting when he says at the “palm at the end of the mind” because I first interpreted palm to be the palm of one’s hands which is very tangible and immediate, or it could be a palm tree which relates to nature and creates a sense of more distance. As I read on, I thought the speaker was talking about a palm tree because the bird is singing on the palm. It sings “without human feeling, a foreign song” which contrasts with the human viewer and the inhuman bird. In this way, the bird represents its own existence and “mere being” on the palm tree. Seeing the bird singing and existing makes the speaker realize that the reason we are happy or unhappy is not what we think it is. It may simply be because these feelings exist and are there because we are human. Stevens concludes with a final stanza that creates an even greater distance with the bird. In the last stanza, the bird is on the palm tree which is at the edge of space, a very vague and abstract area. In the very first line, the palm tree is said to be at the end of the mind, which is also very abstract. Perhaps it is the viewer that is in a strange place in time and space, and sees this image during the speaker’s “last thought”. The setting in which this poem takes place is fascinating to think about because where is the end of the mind and edge of space? Our thoughts are endless and space is infinite. Rather than flying through the sky, the bird stands on the palm and “The bird’s fire-fangled feather’s dangle down.” The abstract setting and the image of the bird makes me think that the speaker may be approaching death, and the vision of the phoenix induces the speaker to reflect on what life means, what it means to be. And perhaps the mere act of being is okay. 

Snowmen and “The Snow Man”

Loading Likes...

I can’t think of many things more magical than falling snow, but I’ve always had terrible circulation. Yet, I can remember a few precious years of not noticing the cold, even long after it had stung my cheeks and seeped deep into my bones. My father would have covered any potentially exposed skin with fleece and waterproof-lined down, executing daily on his secret trick. If you put your mittens on before sliding your arms down the sleeve of your winter coat, you form a protective seal– avoiding that freezing gap left otherwise at your wrists. When you walk outside like that, bundled up in care from head to toe, you don’t feel the chill at your back when you lie flat in a snowdrift. You see the stark bluebird sky above, and the way everything sharply sparkles in the cold. You notice if the snow feels powdery or packable; can you build a snowman, or will you take sleds to the hillside?

To not find “misery in the sound of the wind,”  Wallace Stevens’s “The Snow Man” believes that “ One must have a mind of winter,” and “have been cold a long time” (8, 1,4). The poem suggests that to accept winter, one needs to have forgotten the satisfaction of a warmer time. Remembering anything less bare and biting than January will only bring a feeling of bitterness for what used to be. Ultimately, “the listener, who listens in the snow, / And, nothing himself, beholds / Nothing that is not there and the nothing that is” (13-15). For a poem entitled “The Snow Man,” the sentiment that winter’s listener must be empty himself in order to accept the emptiness around him struck me as strange. Snowmen, the product of play, should represent a certain kind of joy. Here, the snow man has grown frozen himself, filled with the numbness of winter and none of its bliss.

Really, you can grit your teeth through winter, or just accept its bitterness. I think that truly loving winter entails entering it in a way that permits you to love it; to wrap yourself up in warmth that will last long enough for you to access the priorities of childhood. To be able to play, protected from the elements. I was a lucky enough kid to know a well-lit home, where I could eventually run to as dusk fell. If we’re all to be faced with January’s cold despair, we all deserve to know the kind of care that seals out the cold.

 

The Fish

Loading Likes... I chose to write this week’s blog post on the poem “The Fish” by Mariane Moore. What originally stood out to me about the poem was the detailed imagery that captures the beauty of the sea so well. However, as I continued to re-read the poem I found that the poem possessed a much deeper meaning than simply describing the ocean’s beauty. I interpreted this poem to carry deep themes of humanity v.s. nature. Moore’s imagery paints a peaceful picture of the sea making it seem as though the sea creatures, plants, and other parts of the sea all live in harmony. One part of the poem that particularly stood out to me was lines 8-13 which says, “The barnacles which encrust the side//of the wave, cannot hide//there for the submerged shafts of the//sun,//split like spun//glass”. These barnacles are not actually part of the wave but this image of the rays of sun and barnacles coming together in one wave creates this feeling of peace and unity within the sea. It is as if all parts of the sea are tied together in some way co-existing.

However, this peacefulness of nature is not free from the touch of mankind. Later on in the poem it is revealed that humans have left a mark on the cliff when the poem says, “dynamite grooves, burns, and//hatchet strokes, these things stand//out on it”. The disruptiveness of the human touch on the natural rock face is revealing of the destructiveness of humanity. However, despite humanity disrupting nature, nature endures. The poem explains how the cliff lives on and “the sea grows old in it”. I found this line to be revealing of how Moore views nature. Despite the disruptiveness of humanity, the harmony of nature endures and outlives any harm done. In addition to this comparison between humanity and nature, Moore also compares the disruptive nature of humanity with disruptions within the ocean ecosystem. In lines 18-20 the poem reveals that the ocean itself has also disrupted the cliff saying, “The water drives a wedge//of iron through the iron edge//of the cliff”. However, despite the waves cracking the rockface open the poem reveals that this allows for a home for numerous sea creatures. Within the sea this cracking of the rock, that was so destructive from humanity, is a natural process that supports the life of the sea.

Overall, the poem “The Fish” carries messages of a comparison between nature and humanity as well as the destruction of mankind.

The Insignificance of Icarus

Loading Likes...

I love when art is referenced in poetry, so I immediately gravitated towards writing about “Landscape with the Fall of Icarus” for my blog post. This poem really proposes a beautiful message, and begins with a clear purpose (that is only heightened when looking at the painting it is paired with). The first stanza alone is shocking in its redirection from the generic. Williams writes “According to Brueghel / when Icarus fell / it was spring”. This line was so jawing for me because it highlighted aspects about the infamous story of Icarus that are usually insignificant. The subject of this stanza is not Icarus — it is spring. This poems story is not set up to remind readers about the overused and cliche remark “Don’t fly too close to the sun” that is usually referred to when discussing Icarus. William’s discusses the “ordinary” events that went on when Icarus perished — and the same events that were not effected in the slightest by Icarus’s fall from the sky. To the “farmer [who] was ploughing”, the melting of Icarus’s beautiful wings and his plunge into the sea was completely unimportant. Williams even writes that the splash was “unnoticed” by those around. With Icarus being (arguably) one of the most famous characters in Greek mythology, it’s refreshing to remember that his death was as insignificant as it was infamous. It is also important to note that Williams wrote this poem after Brueghel’s painting, which is shown below. The painting is equally as impactful, as most viewers will glance at this painting and admire it for the beautiful landscape and entrancing colors — and not the flailing man drowning in the lower right corner. It is remarkable how poet and painter can create such a connection of emotion between two different mediums, with both producing the same message. Although I believe there are multiple messages to get from this painting and poem, I like to see this story in a more positive light. Life will continue to move on, and even an event like the fall of Icarus will remain unnoticed by many. While that insinuates that we as humans are insignificant against the plethora of things that are happening at any given time, it is heartening to think that there is so much happiness and light that can surround so much tragedy and despair. 

The Emperor of Ice Cream

Loading Likes...

Who would’ve thought? Wallace Stevens really was a sweet tooth in real life, and he may have given himself that title of the poem. The two stanzas were…bizarre, to say the least. From what I’ve read, I think it goes from calling a muscular scooper who smokes cigars to make ice cream, transitioning to a funeral for a dead woman. I had a bunch of questions that came into my head when reading this. Why was ice cream being juxtaposed with literal death? Who was the “only emperor of ice cream”? And is the author saying ice cream is a more fitting eulogy over flowers and paid respects?

Up until the last two lines, I was curious as to why it was written to have children get ice cream They’re (not the scooper) experiencing the joys of tasting a sweet treat. Then there’s other objects like “flowers in last month’s newspapers (6)” being brought in for something. How are they related to each other? I thought first stanza made no sense until the second stanza – I think all of them are being brought as eulogies to a deceased woman in a casket. The reason why ice cream is given more focus is that flowers and newspapers don’t provide the same kind of emotion – they’re nice to look at, but ice cream is not only nice to look at, but also tastes good. This also applied in the mid 1900s, where ice cream was used as comfort food during the Great Depression and immigrants also had ice cream as a meal. The quality of food was a way to compare people’s lifestyles. 

The biggest thing I observed was the repetition of the last lines (and to an extent, the second-to-last) of both stanzas: “The only emperor is the emperor of ice-cream (8, 16)”. I think a lot of the meaning is highlighted in the second stanza, where there’s justification as to why ice cream is being used as a juxtaposition between life and death. Ice cream is meant as a subtle metaphor for sweetness: it’s a positive moment in life. In this sense, the “emperor” of ice cream is death. All good things must come to an end. All the innocence, all the beauty, all the joys of our life will melt away. And the corpse is an example of a life that is spent.  The “emperor” of ice cream is essentially watching people live and die. This is why the children brought ice cream to her: it was a way to remember all the good times in life. There will be people to share these moments, and there will be scoopers that will make these moments possible. 

With this mind, I say that this poem was quite a treat to read.